Domina Ex Rel. Domina v. Pratt
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, C. J.
Although a physician is not required to have the-highest degree of skill obtainable in his profession, or even that shown by those whose location affords them unusual opportunities for practice, he is held responsible for the pos session of ordinary skill and knowledge in matters pertaining to his calling and to ordinary care in the exercise thereof. Sheldon v. Wright, 80 Vt. 298, 314, 67 Atl. 807. The result of his treatment is not determinative of the performance of his obligation (Parker v. Bowen, 98 Vt. 115, 120, 126 Atl. 522; Rann v. Twitchell, 82 Vt. 79, 84, 71 Atl. 1045, 20 L. R. A.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Platt v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- State v. StacySupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- Sheldon v. WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
- Cummings v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Ronan v. J. G. Turnbull Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Senesac v. Assoc. in Obstetrics & GynecologySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Largess v. TatemSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
- State v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- Sparrow v. CimonettiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948
- Deyo v. KinleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.