Legal Opinion

State v. Reynolds

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 28, 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, Justice.

Alexander Reynolds, Robert Day and Lester E. Feltis appeal from their convictions, after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Lincoln County, Perkins, J.), on one count of gross sexual assault each. The three appeal their convictions on various grounds. Because we find no merit in their contentions, we affirm.

I

The defendants contend that the trial court erred by refusing to give the jury an instruction on the use of evidence of the victim’s prior conviction. On cross-examination, the victim admitted that she had been convicted of theft. At the appropriate juncture, defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Towle v. AubeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  3. State v. BahreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. State v. GiglioSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. State v. PhilbrickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dumont v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. State v. AlmurshidySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. State v. BlackSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. State of Maine v. Buddy RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  5. State v. HarperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API