Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Noe

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 20, 1956PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

The principal question on this appeal is whether an owner who has paid the full contract price which has all been applied to the payment of lien claims is still liable for lien claims up to the amount of the contract price. The Chancellor held the owner not liable under T. C. A. sec. 64-1120, providing:

“Lien limited to contract price.- — The claims secured by lien for labor done, and materials furnished, shall in no case exceed the amount agreed to be paid by the owner in his contract with the original contractor.”

The appellant Union Supply Co., Inc., insists the Chancellor erred in holding…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cole Manufacturing Co. v. FallsTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Clement v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. E. W. Minter Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Simpson v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  5. Richardson v. LaniusTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Harriman Utility BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Kyker Ex Rel. Kyker v. General Motors Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  4. Hasden v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  5. Moran v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API