Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Flandro

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1974No. 11396PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

The parties in this action were previously before this Court in the case of Mitchell v. Flandro,1 which affirmed a trial court judgment in part, reversed it in part, and remanded the action with instructions. This appeal involves a dispute over the calculation of interest owed by the defendants-respondents, C. Ed and Stella Flandro, to the plaintiff-appellant, Leslie L. Mitchell. On remand, the trial court held a hearing and a modified judgment was entered. Thereafter, the respondents filed a motion that requested an order authorizing the deposit of the amount of the modified…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Mitchell v. FlandroIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Snapp v. State Farm & Fire Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Resner v. Northern Pacific RailwayMontana Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Weaver v. Searle Bros.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Dursteler v. DurstelerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Leliefeld v. Panorama Contractors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State Highway Commission v. DeLong Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API