Rutherford v. Zearfoss
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This appeal involves a medical malpractice claim in which the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $1.5 million. The trial court set aside the verdict as excessive and granted a new trial on all issues. At the second trial final judgment was entered for the defendant. This appeal is limited to the consideration of two issues: (1) Was the jury verdict in the amount of $1.5 million excessive? and (2) if it was, should the trial court have granted a new trial on liability and damages, or just on damages alone?
Matthew V. Rutherford, by his mother and next friend, Greta…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smithey v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Rome v. Kelly Springfield Tire Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Ford Motor Co. v. MahoneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
- Supinger v. StakesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Central Virginia Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.C. v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. LipscombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Boyd v. BulalaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.