Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Zearfoss

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 26, 1980No. Record 781364PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This appeal involves a medical malpractice claim in which the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $1.5 million. The trial court set aside the verdict as excessive and granted a new trial on all issues. At the second trial final judgment was entered for the defendant. This appeal is limited to the consideration of two issues: (1) Was the jury verdict in the amount of $1.5 million excessive? and (2) if it was, should the trial court have granted a new trial on liability and damages, or just on damages alone?

Matthew V. Rutherford, by his mother and next friend, Greta…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smithey v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  2. Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Rome v. Kelly Springfield Tire Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. MahoneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  2. Supinger v. StakesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  3. Central Virginia Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.C. v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  4. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. LipscombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  5. Boyd v. BulalaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API