Legal Opinion

Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Lipscomb

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided October 30, 1987No. Record 840737PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

This action for defamation brought by a Richmond public school teacher, Vernelle M. Lipscomb (Lipscomb), against Richmond Newspapers, Inc. (the newspaper), a publisher, and its reporter, Charles E. Cox (Cox), arises out of the publication of a front-page article in the Richmond Times-Dispatch. The trial judge sustained a jury’s award of $45,000 in punitive damages against Cox, but required a remittitur of $900,000 of a $1,000,000 compensatory damage award against both defendants. We will affirm the reduced award of compensatory damages but reverse the award of punitive damages.

I. ISSUES(1)…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Moss v. StockardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Yeagle v. Collegiate TimesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  4. Richard C. Fuisz v. Selective Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  5. WJLA-TV. v. LevinSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API