Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Bartholomew

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 3, 1982No. Record 801026PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoff, J.

This is a manufacturer’s appeal from a judgment entered in favor of a consumer in a products liability case.

Constance Bartholomew filed a motion for judgment seeking compensatory and punitive damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. Plaintiff alleged that Ford Motor Company and Dave Pyles Lincoln Mercury, one of its retail dealers, were liable to her on theories of negligence, strict liability, failure to warn of a design defect, and breach of implied warranty. The trial court granted Dave Pyles’ motion to strike plaintiffs evidence against it but refused Ford’s motion. At…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Massie v. FirmstoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  2. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. v. McReynoldsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  3. Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  4. Edmiston v. KupsenelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  5. Jordan v. SauveSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Philip Morris, Inc. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,479 Theodore Alevromagiros v. Hechinger Company White Metal Rolling and Stamping Corporation of Atlanta, GaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Shevel's, Inc. v. Southeastern Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,032 Daniel Freeman, and Mary Freeman v. Case Corporation, A/K/A J.I. Case Company, a Tenneco Corporation Case InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. Ravenwood Towers, Inc. v. WoodyardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API