Legal Opinion

Cudahy v. Tax Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The consideration of the validity of the additional assessment involves two distinct and separable questions : First, Was the Wisconsin Tax Commission without statutory power on May 23, 1936, to impose an additional assessment upon Michael F. Cudahy, hereinafter called the “taxpayer” ? Second, Did the transactions involved claimed by the taxpayer to be a reorganization result in taxable income to the taxpayer in 1929? Each of these matters will be treated separately.

*320Part I.

The income dealt with was the income for the year 1929. Sec. 71.11 (5), of the statutes of 1929, provided:

“Additional…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Bullen v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Groman v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Newport Co. v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Union Indemnity Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Anderson Bros. v. StoneMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Cudahy v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Opinion No. Oag 46-82, (1982), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API