Opinion No. Oag 46-82, (1982)
Wisconsin Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
FRED A. RISSER, President State Senate
You have requested my opinion as to whether a holding company formed by a public utility corporation would itself be a "public utility" within the meaning of sec. 196.01(1) Stats., and thus subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission (Commission).
You indicate in your request that a public utility corporation has formulated a plan to create a holding company corporation. One element of the plan is an exchange of stock through which the newly formed holding company would acquire all common stock of the public utility corporation…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- North American Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.