Legal Opinion
Bullen v. Wisconsin
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 10, 1916No. 262PublishedCited by 235 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
240 U.S. 625 (1916)
BULLEN
v.
STATE OF WISCONSIN.
No. 262.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 8, 1916.
Decided April 10, 1916.
ERROR TO THE COUNTY COURT OF WAUKESHA COUNTY, STATE OF WISCONSIN.
Mr. John R. Montgomery, with whom Mr. Louis E. Hart, Mr. Jaspersen Smith and Mr. Lloyd R. Steere were on the brief, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Walter Drew, with whom Mr. Walter C. Owen, Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin, was on the brief, for defendant in error.
2Opinion of the Court · HolmesJustice Holmes
This is a proceeding to fix the inheritance tax upon the estate of George Bullen, deceased, a resident of Wisconsin. The Supreme Court…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Blackstone v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Matter of Estate of SwiftNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Eidman v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Hawley v. City of MaldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bullen v. State of WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by235 opinions
- Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Chase National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Burnet v. GuggenheimSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Burnet v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
230 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.