Legal Opinion
Wilcox v. County of Onondaga
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 10, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and in the exercise of discretion and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: American Motors Corporation (AMC) has forfeited its right to challenge the June 11, 1985 order by failing to appeal therefrom. Resettlement was inappropriate as it is available only to correct errors in form, or for clarification, but cannot be used to effect substantial changes (Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558). In August 1985, AMC could object only to demands in the August notice to produce not covered by the June order, i.e., demands…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Johantgen v. Hobart Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Harmon v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Valet v. American Motors Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gannon v. Johnson Scale Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Latuso v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Williamsville Central School District v. Cannon PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Anderson v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.