Johantgen v. Hobart Manufacturing Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Denman, *859J., not partitipating. Memorandum: Plaintiff brought this action as a result of injuries she sustained while operating a meat grinder manufactured by defendant. The meat grinder consists of two main parts, the Hobart No. 12 meat chopper attachment and a power unit which is utilized to run the machine. In her amended complaint plaintiff asserted three causes of action in negligence, strict products liability and breach of warranty under which she set forth two main allegations of defect…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Abrams v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Bennett v. Troy Record Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Carnibucci v. Marlin Firearms Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Falkowitz v. Kings Highway HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cover v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Caldwell v. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Taylor v. BlairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Berg v. Flower Fifth Avenue HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bertocci v. Fiat Motors of North America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.