Legal Opinion

Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: " 'Resettlement’ connotes the revising of the order to make it respond to the decision” (Siegel, NY Prac § 250, at 308). "Resettlement of an order is a procedure designed solely to correct errors or omissions as to form, or for clarification. It may not be used to effect a substantive change in or to amplify the prior decision of the court” (Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 566; see also, Wilcox v County of Onondaga, 132 AD2d 984). Here, pursuant to defendant’s motion to resettle an order in a declaratory judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Wilcox v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barretta v. Webb Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Too Pyo Hong v. Byung Wha YooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Pistolesi v. North Country InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Matter of Town of N. Elba v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  5. Okebiyi v. CrewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API