Legal Opinion

Latuso v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendants were entitled to a protective order insofar as plaintiff’s third demand for interrogatories sought discovery of claims for injuries arising out of the use of power mitre saws that did not have the same guarding or braking systems as Model 1703-1. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges defects in the guarding and braking systems of Model 1703-1; therefore, claims arising out of the use of saws with different guarding and braking systems would not be relevant to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johantgen v. Hobart Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Mestman v. Ariens Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Harmon v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Wilcox v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeDivitis v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Van Horn v. Thompson & Johnson Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Ranne v. HuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API