Legal Opinion

R.T. v. J.E.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 28, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEGAL, J.S.C.

Defendants challenge the constitutionality of New Jersey’s grandparent visitation statute, N.J.S.A 9:2 — 7.1. They allege the statute is violative of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution in that it impermissibly interferes with parents’ fundamental right of liberty to raise children as they see fit. After an extensive review of similar statutes across the nation and opinions of various state courts, this court concludes that N.J.S.A. 9:2-7.1 is constitutional.

Plaintiffs M.T. and R.T. are the maternal grandparents of three children ages 12, 8 and 2. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Santi v. SantiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. Peterson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Berg v. BragdonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  4. A.N. ex rel. S.N. v. S.M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Shambaugh v. WolkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API