Legal Opinion

State v. Sole

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 27, 2009No. 2007-415PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. Defendant entered a conditional plea of guilty to cocaine and marijuana possession after the district court denied his motion to suppress. He appeals the denial of his suppression motion here. Defendant sought to suppress statements and physical evidence gathered by a state trooper after the trooper stopped defendant for speeding, directed him into the police cruiser and questioned him about the smell of marijuana in his car, then conducted what the State maintains was a consensual search of defendant’s car and his passenger’s backpack. We reverse the district court’s decision with…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. Therrien, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. State v. PittsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. State v. Weisler, State v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. State v. Hieu TranSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. State v. BarronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API