Legal Opinion
Pepin v. City of North Bend
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 18, 1961No. Civ. No. 9593PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge.
Parties
The plaintiff R. C. Pepin proceeds herein individually and as the succeeding partner of the copartnership lately consisting of R. C. Pepin, Guy N. McCauley and Velma V. McCauley (Pepin), and is a resident and citizen of the province of British Columbia, Canada. On May 20, 1957, said Guy N. McCauley and Velma V. McCauley were each adjudged to be bankrupts, thereby said copartnership was dissolved, and Pepin succeeded to its assets.
At all pertinent times the defendant City of North Bend (City) was a municipal corporation and body politic of the State of Oregon, and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Cross v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- First State & Savings Bank v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Mattechek v. PughOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Waldorf v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Far West Modular Home Sales, Inc. v. ProapsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Falk v. AmsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Moore & Paulson v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1971
- Grogan v. Harvest Capital Co. (In re Grogan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Far West Modular Home Sales, Inc. v. ProapsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979