Legal Opinion

Moore & Paulson v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided November 19, 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loren D. Hicks, Judge pro tempore.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Department of Revenue holding that the department was without jurisdiction to hear the matter in question. The dis pnte concerns a small house in Lane County belonging to the plaintiffs which is located on land owned by plaintiffs’ landlord. The house was placed on the property by a former tenant who sold his lease and the house to plaintiffs. The lease treated the building as personal property and the plaintiffs reported it as such on their 1964 personal property tax return. The assessor struck the item from the return…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. La Paul v. HeywoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Warm Springs Lumber Co. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rosboro Lumber Co. v. HeineOregon Tax Court · 1979
  2. Bylund v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API