Legal Opinion
Moe v. Centurion Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 18, 1980No. 49697PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Justice.
This action was originally commenced by claimants Moe and Fallon against Chamberlain and The Centurion Investment Company in connection with their purchases of assignments of vendor’s interests in fraudulent contracts for deed. For purposes of this appeal the parties agree that the following summary of facts in the action between Moe, Fallon, Chamberlain and The Centurion Investment Company are representative of the additional 36 claimants’ claims against the Real Estate Education, Research and Recovery Fund (Fund), Chamberlain and The Centurion Investment Company.
Moe purchased…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knopp v. GuttermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Wolff v. HoaglundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Fox v. Prime Ventures, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Shirai v. KarpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Dombalian v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Semrad v. Edina Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Bedow v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Garcia v. New Mexico Real Estate CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. R.S.I. Restoration Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Semrad v. Edina Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992