Legal Opinion
Semrad v. Edina Realty, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 4, 1992No. C4-90-1976Published
1Opinion of the Court
493 N.W.2d 528 (1992)
Joseph SEMRAD, et al., Petitioners, Appellants,
v.
EDINA REALTY, INC., et al., Petitioners, Respondents.
No. C4-90-1976.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
December 4, 1992.
Jan Stuurmans, Stuurmans & Karan, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellants.
George F. McGunnigle, Nancy A. Wiltgen, Leonard, Street & Deinard, Minneapolis, for respondents.
Donald D. Smith, Thomsen & Nybeck, P.A., Edinborough Corporate Center East, Edina, amicus curiae for MN Assoc. of Realtors and Nat'l. Assoc. of Realtors.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
COYNE, Justice.
Individual investors commenced…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Metge v. BaehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Marston v. Minneapolis Clinic of Psychiatry & Neurology, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.