Wolff v. Hoaglund
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
The Real Estate Commissioner, as the respondent to an application filed by plaintiffs as judgment creditors of a licensed real estate salesman under provisions of law governing the Real Estate Education, Research and Recovery Fund (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 10470-10483, particuuarly §§ 10471-10474), has appealed from so much of an order awarding each of the plaintiffs $10,000 and directs the payment of such sum to plaintiff Eloise L. Wolff from the fund. He contends that the trial court erred because that plaintiff and judgment creditor was erroneously joined with her husband as a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Grolemund v. CafferataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Cutting v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nordahl v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Froid v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Booth v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Robinson v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Fox v. Prime Ventures, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.