Legal Opinion
Wong Him v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 3, 1948No. Civ. No. 13598PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Francisco after order sustaining demurrers of respondents city and county of San Francisco and State of California without leave to amend.
The main question here is whether the adoption in 1945 of section 175 of the Revenue and Taxation Code repealed by implication section 3637 of that code.
Appellant, Henry Wong Him, was the owner of two lots in the city and county of San Francisco. In the year 1927-28, the city levied its taxes on the realty, and, in addition, on the -personal property located thereon. The complaint alleges that this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Boyd v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Anglo California National Bank of San Francisco v. LelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Whitmore v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Otis v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Glendale v. Crescenta Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Peninsula Properties Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Arntz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010