Legal Opinion
Arntz v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 24, 2010No. A129173PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
The voters of the City and County of San Francisco imposed term limits on their board of supervisors in 1990 by putting this language into the city charter: “No person elected or appointed as a Supervisor may serve as such for more than two successive four-year terms. Any person appointed to the office of Supervisor to complete in excess of two years of a four-year term shall be deemed, for the purpose of this section, to have served one full term.” (S.F. Charter, 1 § 2.101 (section 2.101).) The practice of counting service of less than four years as a full term is known as…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rando v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Building a Better Redondo, Inc. v. City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Don't Cell Our Parks v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Reliable Tree Experts v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Citizens Planning Ass'n v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.