Legal Opinion

Lohmiller v. Weidenbaugh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 1982No. 1869PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN der VOORT, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order directing that a 40% undivided interest in real property be partitioned. A multitude of pleadings have been filed and argued. We need only highlight a selected number of such filings and orders resulting therefrom.

The parties were married in August 1960. From December 1971 through January of 1975, Hazel Lohmiller, appellee’s mother proceeded to transfer to the parties, as entire-ties property, a total, undivided interest of 40% in her farm. 1 In July 1976, the parties were divorced. On June 23, 1977, Mr. Lohmiller filed a complaint seeking…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Balla v. SladekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Shoup v. ShoupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Blumner v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Raw v. LehnertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Corbett v. WeisbandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Lohmiller v. WeidenbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Roznowski v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Roznowski v. PA. NAT. MUT. CAS. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Fraynert v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API