Legal Opinion

Lohmiller v. Weidenbaugh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1983No. 97 E.D. Appeal Docket 1982PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

Appellant, Joan Lohmiller Weidenbaugh, and appellee, Harold Y. Lohmiller, were married on August 20, 1960. During their marriage, appellee’s mother, Hazel Lohmiller, transferred to appellant and appellee, as tenants by the entireties, a 40% undivided interest in her 170 acre farm located in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. Hazel Lohmiller retained a 60% undivided interest in the farm, as a tenant in common with appellant and appellee. On July 9, 1976, appellee and appellant were divorced.

On June 23, 1977, appellee filed the present equity action pursuant to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Girard School District v. PittengerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Lykiardopoulos v. LykiardopoulosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Lohmiller v. WeidenbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. MAURICE A. NERNBERG & ASSOCIATES v. CoyneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. In Re StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Township of Concord v. Concord Ranch, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Thom, S. v. CDM Auto SalesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Roznowski v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API