Legal Opinion

Langley v. Furman

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtChurch, J.

This proceeding is begun in the above-entitled action for an order restraining the defendants from refusing to sell newspapers,, periodicals, etc., to the plaintiffs.

The action itself is for a permanent injunction of a like nature, and damages alleged to have been sustained by the alleged illegal agreements, actions and conspiracies set forth in the complaint.

The conceded facts are that plaintiffs were engaged as copartners in operating a general cigar, tobacco, confectionery and newsstand business in the city of Niagara Falls, under the firm name of Langley & Clark.

That the defendant Louis…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. . FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Locker v. . American Tobacco CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Straus v. . American Publishers' Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. People v. American Ice Co.New York Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Sultan v. Star Co.New York Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marsich v. Eastman Kodak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API