Legal Opinion
People v. American Ice Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The American Ice Company was indicted for violating the anti-monopoly act.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
(charging jury). The defendant stands indicted for violating the provisions of the so-called “anti-monopoly act” of this state (Consol. Laws, c. 20, ■§§ 340-346). It may not be out of place for the court to state that, so far as the court has knowledge, this is the first indictment under the .provisions of this act which has been brought to trial.
The title of the act describes its purpose and scope. It is entitled:
“An act to prevent monopolies in commodities of common use, and to prohibit restraints of trade and commerce, providing penalties for violations of the provisions of this act,' and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- People v. . PeckensNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Cummings v. . Union Blue Stone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Mobil Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- People v. EpsteanNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1918
- Fellows v. Fairbanks Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Langley v. FurmanNew York Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.