Legal Opinion
Marsich v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 18, 1935Published
1Dissent
Davis, J. (dissenting).
The complaint states a cause of action.
(Gerseta Corporation v. Silk Assn. of America, 220 App. Div. 302; Brown v. Metropolitan News Co., Inc., 149 Misc. 536.) It is alleged, in brief, that defendant Eastman Kodak Company has by various means obtained a practical monopoly of the manufacture and sale of photographic supplies in this State and in the United States; that it has made agreements with dealers so that it has fixed the prices at which these commodities are sold to dealers, retailers and consumers, with the penalty that if any one sells at less than the price…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Straus v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- John D. Park & Sons Co. v. National Wholesale Druggists' Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.