Legal Opinion

Bullard v. Hopkins

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 27, 1905PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Union District Court.— Hon. H. M. Towner, . Judge. Action for damages- based upon a breach as alleged of the covenants of warranty in a deed conveying real estate. Trial was had to the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

The real estate in question consists of a business building, and the ground upon which situate, in the city of Crestón. The same was purchased by plaintiff of defendant in April, 1903, and the purchase price fully paid. The conveyance was by warranty deed in- the ordinary form used in this State, and contained no words of reservation. It appears that one of the store-rooms in the building was at the time in the occupancy of one Leach as a drug store, and in said room was shelving, cases, counters, racks, drawers, and other like property incident to the equipment of a room for use as a drug…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Overman v. . SasserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Ridgeway Stove Co. v. WayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Stillman v. FlennikenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Wilgus v. GettingsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  5. Clark v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cornell College v. CrainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. State Security Bank v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Winnike v. HeymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. In re Van HoveDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1988
  5. Birkel v. NortonNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API