Winnike v. Heyman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Carroll District Court. — M. E. Hutchison, Judge. Action to recover damages consequent upon the removal of a second floor constructed by a tenant in one end of the demised building, and a stairway thereto. At the close of evidence, the court, on motion, directed a verdict for defendant, on which judgment was entered. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
x. fixtoees: Etructlonoí con" I. MacLagan owned Lot 1 and part of Lot 2 in Block 21 in .Carroll, on which stood a brick building. The defendant, as lessee of MacLagan, occupied one room thereof, 19 feet wide and 39 feet long, and basement, as a candy store and ice cream Parl°D from about 1902 until sometime in 1916. In 1909, MacLagan conveyed the premises by warranty deed to Guy. It appears that there was a balcony at the back end, about 6 or 7 feet wide, and 7 feet above the floor, with a narrow stairway up to it. This balcony was attached by two iron rods to the joist above, and rested on a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ray v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Crooks v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Stillman v. FlennikenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Bullard v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Shapira v. BarneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bank of Shelbyville v. HartfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Marty v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Ney v. Eastern Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Goldthorp v. KeenanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Rosenblum v. Terry Carpenter, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.