Legal Opinion
Stillman v. Flenniken
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided June 6, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Appeal from Fayette Circuit Cowt This is an action of replevin for a smutter of the alleged value of seventy-five dollars. The cause was tried to the court and judgment was rendered for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The court found the facts of the case to be as follows: —
“1st. That in the year 1S77 Anderson and Stillman were the owners of the smutter in controversy in this case.
“2d. That at the time Patterson and Dykens were the owners of, or interested in, the East Auburn Mills.
“3d. That Anderson and Stillman loaned the smutter in question to Patterson and Dykens, the said Patterson and Dykens to pay for the use thereof, what would be equal to ten per cent per annum, on the cost of said smutter.
*451“4th. That said smutter was to be returned, but no time agreed upon for such return.
“5th. That said smutter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ottumwa Woolen Mill Co. v. HawleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Farrar v. ChauffeteteNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Whitney v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
- Bringholff v. MunzenmaierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Powell v. Monson & Brimfield Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1824
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Leach v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Fred W. Wolf Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Burbridge v. TherrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Winnike v. HeymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.