Legal Opinion

Cohn v. Union Pacific Railroad

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided February 11, 1977No. Civ. 75-0-247 to 75-0-251PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DENNEY, District Judge.

These consolidated cases are before the Court for decision on the merits upon the parties’ stipulation of facts. In accordance with Rule 52(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., the Court makes the following findings of facts and conclusions of law.

The United States Attorney for the District of Nebraska instituted these actions under the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, 38 U.S.C. § 2021 et seq., on behalf of plaintiffs, Dennis Cohn, Daniel Mathers, Ralph Gosnell, Harry Miles and Thomas Meduna. 1 Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 2022. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Tilton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Oakley v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Foster v. Dravo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bunnell v. New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension FundDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980
  2. Almond v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Beard v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1980
  4. Dennis Cohn v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  5. Cohn v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API