Wright v. Strobeck
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAINES, J., pro tem.
This action was originally brought by Alice H. Wright, plaintiff and respondent, as assignee of Harrison G. Sloane and Robert B. Burch, to recover from appellant G. L. Strobeck, and V. A. Adams and W. E. McDonald, as defendants, the amount of certain attorneys’ fees alleged to be due from them to said Sloane and Burch. The complaint, as initially filed, set out two causes of action, the first, against all three defendants upon a quantum meruit, and the second, against Strobeck alone upon an account stated, both counting on an alleged employment of respondent’s assignors by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wiggins v. BurkhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Oil Co. v. Van EttenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hendy v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Crane v. StansburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Biltmore Press v. UsadelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942