In Re Electric Refund Cases
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
INTRODUCTION
The facts underlying this appeal concern the intricate realm of California’s energy crisis of May 2000 to June 2001. The precise legal issue, however, is relatively straightforward: the exhaustion of administrative remedies doctrine. Plaintiffs and appellants are Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (collectively referred to as the IOU’s), 1 entities that bought electricity during the crisis. Defendant and respondent is Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (Arizona), which sold electricity…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Campbell v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sustainability v. Dep't of Res. Recycling & Recovery, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- City of Jurupa Valley v. City of Riverside CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Grosz v. Cal. Dept. Tax & Fee AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Grosz v. Cal. Dept. of Tax & Fee AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- SPRAWLDEF v. Dept. of Resources Recycling and RecoveryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.