American Visuals Corporation v. Frederick A. Holland and Sam Schwartz
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The granting or refusing of an injunction pendente lite is ordinarily a discretionary matter for the district judge, whose decision will not be reversed unless an abuse of discretion is apparent. Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker, 253 U.S. 136, 141, 40 S.Ct. 463, 64 L.Ed. 822; Huber Baking Co. v. Stroehmann Bros. Co., 2 Cir., 208 F.2d 464, 465, 467; Aeolian Co. v. Fischer, 2 Cir., 29 F.2d 679, 681; Behre v. Anchor Ins. Co., 2 Cir., 297 F. 986, 991. We see no such abuse in the case at bar.
The motion was heard upon supporting and opposing affidavits and the copies, attached to the complaint, of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker, NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Huber Baking Co. v. Stroehmann Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Behre v. Anchor Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Aeolian Co. v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- United States v. One 1951 Oldsmobile Sedan Model 98District Court, D. Connecticut · 1954
3Cited by24 opinions
- Salinger v. ColtingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Joshua Meier Company, Inc. v. Albany Novelty Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Gillette Company v. Ed Pinaud, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Carroll v. Associated Musicians of Greater New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Gross v. KennedyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.