Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1951 Oldsmobile Sedan Model 98

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 10, 1954No. 4528PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This is an action for condemnation and forfeiture of a car on the ground that it was used to facilitate the sale of narcotic drugs. Barry Motors Company, holder of a conditional bill of sale on the car, is claimant.

Findings of Fact

October 19, 1953 federal narcotic agents agreed to purchase on consignment from George Malloy, husband of the registered owner of the car in question, $100 worth of heroin on consignment for $60.

On October 20, the agents met Malloy by appointment and drove him to West Hartford, where he made a telephone call, then to East Hartford and South…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Platt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. United States v. ONE DODGE COUPE, ETC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  3. United States v. One 1941 Pontiac SedanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. United States v. One 1949 Ford SedanDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1951

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1972 Datsun, Vehicle Identification No. LB1100355950District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1974
  2. American Visuals Corporation v. Frederick A. Holland and Sam SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  3. United States v. ONE 1970 BUICK RIVIERA, SER. NO. 949870H920701District Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
  4. United States v. One 1973 VolvoDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1974
  5. People v. One 1952 Mercury 2-Door SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API