Legal Opinion
Aeolian Co. v. Fischer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 10, 1928No. 84PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The appellants claim that they are entitled to an injunction under the provisions of the Sherman Act (26 Stat. 209), as amended by the Clayton Act (38 Stat. 730). The lower court found against this contention because the defendants did not conspire to exclude plaintiffs’ organs from interstate commerce, but only to coerce the employment of union labor in the local work of installation and maintenance. The object of the defendants’ conduct was not to compel plaintiffs to unionize their factories, as in Duplex Co. v. Deering, 254 U. S. 443, 41 S. Ct. 172, 65…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Bedford Cut Stone Co. v. Journeymen Stone Cutters' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Eccles v. Peoples Bank of Lakewood VillageSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Foundry Services, Inc. v. Beneflux CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- American Visuals Corporation v. Frederick A. Holland and Sam SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Douds v. Wine, Liquor & Distillery Workers Union, Local 1District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.