Legal Opinion

Oconnell v. Cowger

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 12, 2012No. 181102094; A148165Published

1Per curiam

The trial court entered a permanent stalking protective order (SPO) against respondent, who now appeals, arguing that petitioner failed to establish the necessary elements for obtaining an SPO. We agree and therefore reverse.

ORS 30.866, the civil stalking statute, authorizes a court to issue a stalking protective order against a person if (1) the person “intentionally, knowingly or recklessly engages in repeated and unwanted contact with [another] person or a member of that person’s immediate family or household thereby alarming or coercing the other person,” (2) the other person’s alarm or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Braude v. BraudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Falkenstein v. FalkensteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Barnett v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API