Legal Opinion

State v. Talsma

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 15, 1978No. 49,705PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Meyer, J.:

This is an appeal from a proceeding in which appellant was found guilty of indirect contempt for refusing to answer questions during a district attorney’s inquisition.

On June 8, 1977, appellant plead guilty to drug conspiracy charges and was sentenced. The prosecutor recited a plea agreement to the court. On October 10, 1977, the trial court modified appellant’s sentence, placing him on probation for five years. That same day, appellant was served with a subpoena to appear at a district attorney’s inquisition. The appellant and his attorney appeared at the district attorney’s office…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. State v. MufichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Investigation Into the Homicide of T.H.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  2. Burden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API