Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 20, 1989No. 61,815Published

1DissentSix, J.

In my view, this criminal case concerns the trial court’s discretion in the enforcement of a plea agreement. Pursuant to K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 22-3602(b)(l), the State appeals the trial court’s dismissal of an information charging defendant Richard Smith with delivery of cocaine (K.S.A. 65-4127a).

The sole issue for our review should be: Did the trial court abuse its discretion in ruling that prosecution was barred by the terms of a prior plea agreement?

Following his arraignment, Smith filed a motion to dismiss, alleging that prosecution was barred by the terms of the prior plea agreement. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. State v. HammangOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API