Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Martin

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 16, 2012No. 12-3163UnpublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

MARY BECK BRISCOE, Chief Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 84.1(G). The case is, therefore, submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff-Appellant Gregory D. Crosby, a federal prisoner appearing pro se, appeals the dismissal of his complaint asserting a claim for damages pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Kay v. BemisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Minneci v. PollardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Peoples v. CCA Detention CentersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Armitage v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  2. Badger v. ChapmanDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019
  3. Bowers v. RogersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  4. Brewster v. Doe IDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  5. Burns v. Corrections Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API