Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Muskegon Heights

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1951No. Docket 53, Calendar 45,066PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

An action for damages was commenced against John Farkas, a police officer of Muskegon Heights, charging that he wantonly, maliciously, and without provocation, committed an assault upon Bennie Hildreth.

Plaintiff Nathan Johnson, a taxpayer, sought injunctive relief against defendant city of Muskegon Heights, for the purpose of restraining it from paying any money or furnishing any services in connection with the defense of Farkas.

Johnson alleged in his bill of complaint that the defendant, through its city commission, undertook the defense of the suit against Farkas and caused the appearance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Lafayette Dramatic Productions, Inc. v. FerentzMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Sullivan v. Michigan State Board of DentistryMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Warren Township School District No. 7 v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Roberts Tobacco Co. v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Michigan Chiropractic Council v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. ConatMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. King v. Director of the Midland County Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. MalloryMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. IaconisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API