Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Michigan State Board of Dentistry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1934No. Docket No. 123, Calendar No. 37,909PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Gordon B. Sullivan and others, duly licensed and practicing dentists, filed a bill to restrain the Michigan State board of dentistry from enforcing Act No. 235, Pub. Acts 1933. The Michigan State Dental Society has intervened as a defendant.

Section 2 of the act provides:

“Said board shall adopt rules and regulations for its own organization and for the practice of den tistry in this State and for carrying out the provisions of this act, and may amend, modify and repeal said rules and regulations from time to time. The said rules and regulations and any amendments thereto shall become effective…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Motz v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Grand Rapids Booming Co. v. JarvisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Attorney General v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Cruickshank v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lawrence Baking Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  2. People v. McQuillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Straus v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Denver Bar Association v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API