Legal Opinion
Michigan Chiropractic Council v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance Services
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 2006No. Docket 126530, 126531PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Petitioners, two organizations representing the interests of Michigan chiropractors, challenged the validity of the “Preferred Provider Option” offered by appellants to their policyholders. In count I of their petition, petitioners claimed that the option violated the rights of the appellants’ insureds. In count II of their petition, petitioners claimed a violation of the rights of chiropractic providers. Regarding count I, we hold that *367petitioners do not satisfy the test for third-party standing, and may not litigate the claims of appellants’ insureds. Regarding count II, assuming arguendo…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Kevin Krohn v. Home-Owners Ins CoMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation v. Nestlé Waters North America IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Flint Cold Storage v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- City of Huntington Woods v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.