Lym v. Thompson
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PRATT, Justice.
This action is founded upon the alleged conversion of 119 steel 4" tubes for which the lower court awarded plaintiff a judgment of $1412.64 with costs. The defendant has ap pealed and raised two important issues: (1) Did plaintiff prove the (a) ownership of and (b) the number of the tubes taken by circumstantial evidence? (2) Is the O. P. A. price of tubes the measure of the value of the tubes?(1) (a) In disposing of the issues of ownership and identity we shall consider all the evidence regardless from which side it was produced in view of the fact that the issues do not raise…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. McNeelyArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Ross Produce Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Tierney v. General Exchange Ins.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1945
- Bowles v. BrannaganDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Zemel v. Commercial Warehouses, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
3Cited by4 opinions
- Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. JolleyUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Lowe v. RosenlofUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- Performance Systems, Inc. v. KahlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. JolleyUtah Supreme Court · 1970