Zemel v. Commercial Warehouses, Inc.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Case, J.

The appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court whose opinion, sufficiently stating the facts, is reported in 132 N. J. L. 14. The case — an action for conversion — was there on appeal by the present respondent from a judgment against him in the Clifton District Court.

The decision in Ward v. Huff, 94 N. J. L. 81, was accepted by both the District Court and the Supremo Court and is accepted before us by both litigants as stating the correct rule as to damages in an action for conversion. The statement there is this: “The rule is settled and…