Sanville v. Williams
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, C.J.
The plaintiff had a bad fall on the premises of the defendants and sued to recover for her injuries. The jury found for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals, seeking a new trial. All claims of error are based on the instructions given the jury.
The defendants operated a tree business, selling cut Christmas trees at the appropriate season and trees for transplanting at other times. One of the people the defendants hired on a day-to-day basis when the work justified shared the plaintiff’s residence with her. Plaintiff Sanville had been in the habit of taking him to and from work for about…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rich v. Tite-Knot Pine MillOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Morris v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Palmisano v. TownsendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- Robillard v. TillotsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954
- Porreca v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Perkins v. Windsor Hospital Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Poulin v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Lanphere v. BeedeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Muir v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Buzzell v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.