Legal Opinion

Porreca v. Atlantic Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1961No. Appeal, 240PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Bell,

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit which may be entered only in a clear case. Giving plaintiff the benefit of all the evidence in his favor and all reasonable inferences therefrom — as the well settled rule requires: Castelli v. Pittsburgh-Railways Co., 402 Pa. 135, 165 A. 2d 632; Borzik v. Miller, 399 Pa. 293, 159 A. 2d 741; — a jury could have found the following facts:

Plaintiff brought an action in trespass 17 months after the accident which caused his injuries. He alleged that defendant was negligent in maintaining a grease pit in its garage without…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frederick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Engle v. ReiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ZebeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  4. Dumanski v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Borzik v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Carpenter v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Mathis v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Oswald v. HausmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Sanville v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API