Porreca v. Atlantic Refining Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Bell,
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit which may be entered only in a clear case. Giving plaintiff the benefit of all the evidence in his favor and all reasonable inferences therefrom — as the well settled rule requires: Castelli v. Pittsburgh-Railways Co., 402 Pa. 135, 165 A. 2d 632; Borzik v. Miller, 399 Pa. 293, 159 A. 2d 741; — a jury could have found the following facts:
Plaintiff brought an action in trespass 17 months after the accident which caused his injuries. He alleged that defendant was negligent in maintaining a grease pit in its garage without…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frederick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Engle v. ReiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ZebeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Dumanski v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Borzik v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Carpenter v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Mathis v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Oswald v. HausmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Sanville v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.