Legal Opinion

Palmisano v. Townsend

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 11, 1978No. 152-76 & 153-76PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

These two appeals from the Washington Superior Court involve two civil actions that were tried together below. In both actions the plaintiffs, who purchased adjoining properties through Rudolph Townsend, a real estate broker and registered land surveyor, alleged that Townsend and Richard Wheeler, a licensed professional engineer, were negligent in assembling the data needed to support a subdivision permit application and in designing a septic disposal system. After trial, judgments were entered in accordance with the jury’s verdicts, which awarded damages against both defendants in each case.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Pierce Subdivision ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. Houghton v. LeinwohlSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  3. State v. BressetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  4. Paton v. SawyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  5. Merrill v. RevilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Windsor Hospital Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. Lemnah v. American Breeders Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  3. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  4. Proctor Trust Co. v. Upper Valley Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  5. Contractor's Crane Service, Inc. v. Vermont Whey Abatement AuthoritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API