Segars-Andrews v. Judicial Merit Selection Commission
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
This is a matter in our original jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, we are constrained to dismiss the complaint.
I
Factual/Procedural Background
Pursuant to the South Carolina Constitution, the election and reelection of justices and judges in South Carolina’s unified judicial system is vested solely in the South Carolina General Assembly. These judgeships include supreme court justice, court of appeals judge, circuit court judge, and family court judge. The Judicial Merit Selection Commission (JMSC) is constitutionally and statutorily charged with evaluating the qualifications and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Munoz-FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Beaufort County v. South Carolina State Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Abbeville County School District v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- South Carolina Public Interest Foundation v. South Carolina Transportation Infrastructure BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Alexander v. HoustonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- McConnell v. HaleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.